Daily Market Update – March 10, 2014 (Close)

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – March 10, 2014 (Close)

Even though I know that hoping for something to happen doesn’t have as much power as I might like, that doesn’t stop me from continuing the process.

Following weeks in which I’ve had a fair number of assignments my hope is usually for a lower open on Monday and maybe finding an opportunity to pick up some replacement positions as they’re (hopefully) on temporary bargain status.

The pre-open trading to begin the week looks as if it’s going to offer one of those opportunities, which haven’t been very frequent, but weighing on the markets is still the situation in Crimea.

As it would turn out the market was down the entire day, but well off of its lows as there really wasn’t any news to confuse things today.

While there’s not likely to be a substantive longer term impact from most likely outcomes from the area, there’s no doubt that a short term impact can easily come and it can come with  no notice. Rarely is there the simple courtesy of being given advanced notice, although after the fact many will point to the signs that predicted the unpredictable.

Looking at the mildly declining prices that appear set to begin the trading week it makes me wonder more than usual whether they represent an opportunity or a trap. Either of those is only possible when you have spare money in hand, so there may be advantages to not being burdened with that state of liquidity.

There’s no doubt that erring on the side of caution has exacted its own price as we celebrate the 5th year of the inflection point as the market turned around from its 2009 lows. Pardon me for mixing Latin and French phraseology, but It has really been as if Mardi Gras’ sine quo non expression “Laissez les bons temps rouler,” has been in force non-stop since then. Having been to New Orleans on multiple occasions no one can keep up that level for more than a few days, but the market has done so for 5 years.

Whatever cautionary note may be struck today could easily have been struck a year ago, which is about the time that I started feeling the need to develop cash reserves and the related need to spend down those cash reserves.

In addition to continuing concern over events there is new news from China that their economy isn’t as strong as we had recently believed it to be, after already having factored in a less robust economy. Japan wasn’t much better, but our expectations there have been low for 20 years.

So with the week starting with expressions of economic weakness and continued international uncertainty, I’m less inclined to spend money this Monday morning as I would have anticipated while tallying the previous week’s results just a few days ago.

This is another week that has a number of positions going ex-dividend and already has a good representation of positions with contracts expiring. Hopefully, some of those positions will be assigned and others rolled over to keep the process going and going.

But because of some concern about the potential for weakness this week there may be reason to look for expirations next week or even further for any new purchases considered. Of course, that is still tempered by the realization that time isn’t as valuable as it used to be back in the good old days when volatility was a reliable partner in creating profits. Sometimes when looking at the paltry marginal premium rece
ived for each additional week of time it’s difficult to justify tying up a position when the past 5 years has shown a market that just proceeds higher.

I’m currently at approximately 42% cash and was willing to get down to 25%. I don’t believe that I’m now willing to get to that level and will again try to focus on lower beta, and where available, dividend paying positions, for the week.

As always, events and sentiments can and do change so quickly.

Hopefully, they will.

 

 

 

PS: For those surprised, or even shocked that your Kohls shares weren’t assigned early (and you were in the vast majority), it’s all a question of pennies and time.

Had these shares gone ex-dividend last Friday on a March 7, 2014 option or perhaps this Thursday with a March 14, 2014 option, those shares closing at $55.45 and offering a $0.39 dividend, would have been well above the threshold price of $54.89. That price represents the minimal price at which a break-even could be obtained if the option holder chose to exercise early. That break-even analysis, however covers neither the original cost to buy the option nor the commissions. In such a case, with very little time value left on the option it would have been better for the option holder to exercise early and then immediately sell shares the following morning, collecting any profit on shares and the dividend.

However, look at the situation of Kohls which went ex-dividend on a Monday and still had 5 days of time value left in the option premium.

Shares opened trading this morning at $54.90. For an option buyer who exercised his contract and took possession of shares he had to lay out $5450 to exercise. If he was able to immediately sell his shares he would have pocketed a $0.40 profit on shares and a $0.39 dividend, for a total of $0.79. Of course, you would then have to subtract the cost of the option he bought to actually calculate his net.

However, if instead he elected to sell his option contract at either Friday’s close or Monday’s open he would have gotten $0.85 for his efforts. Not only is that $0.06 more than if he would have exercised, but it was also without assuming the risk of owning shares, even if only for 10 seconds after the pre-open started trading on Monday. Professionals, or those holding large positions are going to be much more likely to take the certain profit rather than the risk and the large outlay of assets to exercise.

For the rational individual investor option buyer who was otherwise bullish on shares, they would have held onto their option in the belief that there was greater opportunity to trade it during the course of the coming week than to own shares and collect the dividend. Certainly it would require no additional need to tie up cash. For the bearish holder of an option contract the appeal of holding shares isn’t there, so they, too, are less inclined to exercise early. If anything, if they are bearish on shares they will move quickly to close their option position in order to squeeze out and keep any premium that may be left.

Those most likely to consider an early exercise would be those that had bought such option contracts at at a point that shares were well below the $54.50 strike and therefore were very inexpensive to buy. However, there would likely be very few of those original low cost option buyers remaining because the real profits would have come in selling their contracts during the course of Kohls’ rise, that on a percentage basis would have brought them far greater profits due to leveraging than owning shares and collecting a dividend ever would.

So who then is left to exercise early? Anyone bullish on shares and recognizing that in a low volatility environment their option contract  growth in premium would be limited by its upcoming expiration might consider early exercise, although the majority of those would more likely roll over their option contracts to a future week in the belief that greater share gains are to come.

There are also those that had intended to exercise shares anyway as it came upon its expiration date, because they wanted to own shares at the specified price. Instead of waiting 5 days why not take possession early and also get the dividend?

And finally, there are always an irrational few.

As in a game of blackjack you really don’t want to have an irrational player in the game even though there’s a chance that their actions will be to your benefit. That kind of wild card in the game just isn’t worth it and reduces the impact of your own skill set.

If I were to give homework assignments I would ask you to then explain why some people didn’t have their AIG shares assigned early on Friday morning when shares closed well above the threshold on Thursday.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daily Market Update – March 10, 2014

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – March 10, 2014 (9:30 AM)

Even though I know that hoping for something to happen doesn’t have as much power as I might like, that doesn’t stop me from continuing the process.

Following weeks in which I’ve had a fair number of assignments my hope is usually for a lower open on Monday and maybe finding an opportunity to pick up some replacement positions as they’re (hopefully) on temporary bargain status.

The pre-open trading to begin the week looks as if it’s going to offer one of those opportunities, which haven’t been very frequent, but weighing on the markets is still the situation in Crimea.

While there’s not likely to be a substantive longer term impact from most likely outcomes from the area, there’s no doubt that a short term impact can easily come and it can come with  no notice. Rarely is there the simple courtesy of being given advanced notice, although after the fact many will point to the signs that predicted the unpredictable.

Looking at the mildly declining prices that appear set to begin the trading week it makes me wonder more than usual whether they represent an opportunity or a trap. EIther of those is only possible when you have spare money in hand, so there may be advantages to not being burdened with that state of liquidity.

There’s no doubt that erring on the side of caution has exacted its own price as we celebrate the 5th year of the inflection point as the market turned around from its 2009 lows. Pardon me for mixing Latin and French phraseology, but It has really been as if Mardi Gras’ sine quo non expression “Laissez les bons temps rouler,” has been in force non-stop since then. Having been to New Orleans on multiple occasions no one can keep up that level for more than a few days, but the market has done so for 5 years.

Whatever cautionary note may be struck today could easily have been struck a year ago, which is about the time that I started feeling the need to develop cash reserves and the related need to spend down those cash reserves.

In addition to continuing concern over events there is new news from China that their economy isn’t as strong as we had recently believed it to be, after already having factored in a less robust economy. Japan wasn’t much better, but our expectations there have been low for 20 years.

So with the week starting with expressions of economic weakness and continued international uncertainty, I’m less inclined to spend money this Monday morning as I would have anticipated while tallying the previous week’s results just a few days ago.

This is another week that has a number of positions going ex-dividend and already has a good representation of positions with contracts expiring. Hopefully, some of those positions will be assigned and others rolled over to keep the process going and going.

But because of some concern about the potential for weakness this week there may be reason to look for expirations next week or even further for any new purchases considered. Of course, that is still tempered by the realization that time isn’t as valuable as it used to be back in the good old days when volatility was a reliable partner in creating profits. Sometimes when looking at the paltry marginal premium received for each additional week of time it’s difficult to justify tying up a position when the past 5 years has shown a market that just proceeds higher.

I’m currently at approximately 42% cash and was willing to get down to 25%. I don’t believe that I’m now willing to get to that level and will again try to focus on lower beta, and where available, dividend paying positions, for the week.

As always, events and sentiments can and do change so quickly.

Hopefully, they will.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dashboard – March 10 -14, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

MONDAY:   Little indication of any developing trend to begin the week although a hint of weakness may get us started. As often the case, opportunity or trap are the competing themes.

TUESDAY:     Another directionless day appears to be ahead awaiting any kind of catalyst or excuse

WEDNESDAY:  Another listless opening with hopefully a better outcome than the past two days. Little on the ecomomic reports horizon for the rest of the week to suggest a course change

THURSDAY:    Another non-committal kind of morning setting up in a news and event vacuum

FRIDAY:  Some weeks are happier seen gone than others. The samll glint of optimism erased eraly in the pre-open, but at least no major news overnight to serve as an early morning surprise to end the week.

 

 



                                                                                                                                           

 

 

 





 “SNEAK PEEK AT NEXT WEEK” APPEARS ON FRIDAYS

Sneak Peek

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Weekend Update – March 9, 2014

It was a week of conflict and uncertainty that nonetheless took the market to new highs.

That’s really not the way it’s supposed to work, as the market is said to dislike uncertainty and there’s certainly plenty of that at the moment. Then again, the market is also supposed to dislike being long going into a weekend of uncertainty, yet it can’t resist buying into the close of a trading week, having again done so the past two Friday’s, despite the breaking news and later developing situation in Crimea.

While news seemed to moderate early in the week there was new concern over escalation as the week came to its close, yet the market closed t another record high.

Granted that it was also a week in which the Employment Situation Report was released and as we all know by now that means a week in which the market goes higher, but conflicts on the ground threatened that certainty. While many finally discussed the recent relationship between the market and the Employment Situation Report, you heard it here, first, two reports ago.

Meanwhile, some of the week’s conflict may have had an historical basis going back centuries as Vladimir Putin’s Russia supported a split of Ukraine, while other conflicts, such as between Carl Icahn and Marc Andreessen are more recent and involve the split of eBay (EBAY). Despite the way in which we instinctively await the release of the monthly Employment Situation Report, the only stories that really mattered and garnered any attention were those of conflict.

Putin, Icahn and Andreessen. Two bullies and a visionary, although you can decide what role is assumed by each player, understanding that bullies can also be visionaries.

While Putin seeks to re-draw the map most of us have never really looked at, the battle between Icahn and Andreessen has temporarily pulled eBay off of my map, as it no longer trades in that comfortable range that I had come to appreciate in the quest to sell covered calls on a serial basis. 

Recent reports suggest that the decision to proceed in Crimea was a strategy that emerged haphazardly and was borne out of emotion and deep grievances. In contrast, the conflict surrounding eBay is very likely one that has it its basis simply in differing opinions about where investor value resides. Still, despite what may be well reasoned positions, as with most other aspects of life, I don’t particularly care for conflict and being put in a position to either choose sides or sit and wonder where the new reality will set up shop.

It seems a little surprising that another world leader, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany would describe her recent conversations with Putin as being with a man that she was uncertain was in touch with reality and “in another world.” If accurate, having a world leader possess a somewhat less tenuous grasp of reality should be a concern for markets, although the eBay marketplace is likely to be indifferent as both Icahn and Andreessen toil in worlds of more objective reality.

While international conflict is underway and its outcome is still far from certain that comfortable range is also being exceeded in the market as a whole as it works it way toward new highs despite a paucity of a rational basis. Here too, there’s some conflict, as we’ve all been taught that the market is rational.

I usually have new funds to start each week as the previous week typically has share assignments. This past week was no different. However, faced with cash looking to be spent, markets again at new highs and uncertainty abounding, I’m facing personal conflict as the coming week approaches.

The conflict isn’t over whether to invest that money, as that’s always a given, but what theme to adopt in seeking to find the balance between safety and reward.

Some weeks there a sense of a need to embrace risk and volatility and other weeks there’s an abiding feeling that boring is the new chique.

This week I’m split between the two and see a role for opening the portfolio to both sides of the range. Sometimes the solution is for differing sides to simply get together and understand what each can bring to the table.

As usual, the week’s potential stock selections are classified as being in Traditional, Double Dip Dividend and Momentum categories, with no “PEE” selections this week (see details).

If I were to focus on low beta and presumed safety, at least from the perspective of my trading strategy of utilizing covered options, I would give serious consideration to shares of Altria (MO), Coca Cola (KO) and Merck (MRK) this week, as they all go ex-dividend. However, the premiums of the former are just too low. While collecting both premium and dividend would present an acceptable return, the potential for early assignment would create a poor investment choice. On the other hand, Merck offers both an appealing premium and dividend, but a frightening appearing chart, unless you believe that little can go wrong in just a week.

If you believe that to be the case, you too may be living in another world.

Part of the conflict this week is pitting the desire to find bargain prices and learning to accept the fact that share prices may be creating new normal levels that are, unfortunately, higher and bring with them increased risk, but without concomitant offsets in risk reflected in option premiums.

Both Lowes (LOW) and Home Depot (HD) are now near their yearly highs. Taking a very narrow view, both hav
e out-performed the S&P 500 since the bottom of the most recent attempt at a correction early last month. Normally, that might send me looking elsewhere for a short term opportunity, but I find some solace knowing that they have lagged a bit in the longer term. Both offer reasonable option premiums during this period of low volatility, but Home Depot also offers the potential advantage of being ex-dividend this week.

While Lowes and Home Depot may be near their highs some of the typically lesser volatile positions that I follow and also currently own are at lower prices, having lagged the market and may offer the opportunity and price combination that is becoming more difficult to locate.

There’s not too much reason to recount the recent trials of Target (TGT). In addition to its own security breach issues it has also had the unfortunate experience of being a retailer at a time that retail hasn’t fared terribly well. Following recent less than stellar earnings it did what other retailers did a few weeks ago when those earnings weren’t as disappointing as expected and shares surged. In the meantime shares have come down a bit, but are still far from their not so distant peak.

Marathon Oil (MRO) is also fairly far from its recent peak and has little reason for having suffered such a fate. It is now trading slightly above the mid-range of what had been a comfortable trading range in the past and I believe is a good entry point and hopefully an exit point as well. If Marathon Oil can stay in this range for a little while it option premiums can make this a very attractive recurrent purchase and sale of calls. Already owning some slightly more expensive shares I wouldn’t be adverse to adding to that position and using option premiums to offset paper losses on the initial lot of shares.

A portion of my Holly Frontier (HFC) holdings were assigned this week after a very unexpectedly sharp climb. Shares go ex-dividend this week after having distributed a special dividend earlier in the month. Having bounced back from some recent near term lows its shares are a little higher than that mid-point of the range that I generally like to use when considering adding shares, however the upcoming dividend adds incentive to restore the position. These shares often exhibit large price swings in a narrow time frame and those help to support a very appealing option premium that’s even more generous if the dividend is captured, as well.

While all of the recent excitement has centered around the rumored buyout of Lorillard (LO) by Reynolds American (RAI), Phillip Morris (PM) has languished of late. With events heating up a bit on the European continent perhaps increasing nerves will boost sales of their products, but more likely share price will be supported by talks of merger activity in the sector and visions of new markets in electronic cigarettes and even marijuana for domestic players. Although the prices of both Lorillard, the purchase target, and Reynolds American, the rumored purchaser fell quite a bit after the story was digested, this isn’t likely to be the end of the story. Phillip Morris has protected the $80 level of late and shouldn’t be at risk to decline if such buyout talks fail to move forward, as it didn’t participate in the rumor rally.

While prudence may dictate that priority be placed on re-populating a portfolio with lower risk positions at this time there may still be some room for more adventurous positions.

One of my favorites, despite still holding more expensive shares purchased prior to the dissolution f the potash cartel is Mosaic (MOS). While I haven’t enjoyed their continued position in my portfolio, other than their dividend income production, I have enjoyed the climb from $40 to $50, having owned shares on numerous occasions in the interim. Despite now being at the high end of its post-cartel break-up range, I think that shares are still poised to go higher and continue to offer short term opportunity. Enough so that I would consider not hedging my entire position.

Citigroup (C) is significantly below its highs reached earlier in the year. It has, however, seemed to find support at about the $48 level and responded reasonably well to some recent bad news coming from their Mexican unit. While Citigroup hasn’t been an especially good core long term holding for many, other than those smart enough to have purchased shares at its nadir, it does have the potential to be more rewarding for those looking for small and short term opportunities. Someday, perhaps in my lifetime, it may also increase its payout ratio from its current 0.9% as soon as regulators give that clearance.

Finally, Seagate Technology (STX) is a good example of a stock that saw its price exceed my own comfort level and to which I eventually adapted by accepting a new normal. In the case of Seagate that has happened on any number of occasions over the past two years as it continues to surprise by its continued relevance as a company.

After waiting for a while, I increased that comfort level from $48 to $49.50 by virtue of having sold puts this past Friday. That new higher level itself was some 20% below its January 2014 high.

However, in a tiny fraction of the time that I waited to finally adapt, I found myself having to roll over the put contract to the next week as shares suddenly added to their day’s losses, before recovering near the close. That recovery gives me some additional confidence in recognizing comfort at this level and suggesting that others do so, as well.

Hopefully, if all goes as planned, these disparate selections may find a way to get along and provide a lesson to others.

Traditional Stocks: Lowes, Marathon Oil, Phillip Morris, Target

Momentum Stocks: Citibank, Mosaic, Seagate Technology

Double Dip Dividend: Holly Frontier, Home Depot (ex-div 3/11)

Premiums Enhanced by Earnings: none

Remember, these are just guidelines for the coming week. The above selections may become actionable, most often coupling a share purchase with call option sales or the sale of covered put contracts, in adjustment to and consideration of market movements. The overriding objective is to create a healthy income stream for the week with reduction of trading risk.