Weekend Update – October 12, 2014

As The Federal Reserve’s policy of “Quantitative Easing” comes to an end the next phase considered should perhaps be one of instituting some form of “Quantitative Muzzling.”

Given comments contained in this past week’s FOMC statement had recognized global economic concerns, perhaps the Federal Reserve should consider expanding its dual mandate and reaching across the ocean to affix, adjust and tighten the right remedy.

As most of us learned sometime in childhood, words have consequences. However, we tend not to mind when the consequences are positive for us or when what we all know is left unsaid and ignored.

In each of the past two weeks words from the European Central Bank’s President Mario Draghi have had adverse impacts on global markets. While no one is overtly suggesting that ECB President’s should be seen and not heard, undoubtedly at least one person is thinking that, having applied a sloppy test of correlation to the market’s moves and Draghi’s words.

Such sloppy tests may have at least as much validity as the much discussed “key reversal” seen as trading closed on Wednesday and said to presage a bullish turnaround to the downtrend.

How did that work out for most people?

This week Draghi told us what everyone knows to be the truth, but what no one wants to hear. He simply said that there can be no growth in the European economies without economic reform.

That’s not different from what he said the previous week, as he pointed out that political solutions were necessary to deal with economic woes.

We also all know if it we have to rely on politicians to do the right thing, or make the difficult decisions, we’re not going to fare terribly well, hence the sell-offs. Why the Europeans can’t simply kick things down the road and then forget about it is a question that needs to be asked.

Compare the response to Draghi’s comments to the absolutely effusive response to this past week’s FOMC statement that simply said nothing and ignored answering the question that everyone wanted to ignore.

Despite everyone knowing what Draghi has been saying to be true, having had the same scolding take place in the U.S. just two years ago, no one with an investment portfolio wants to hear of such a thing, especially when it’s followed up with downgrades of Finland’s and France’s credit ratings.

Add to the mix the International Monetary Fund’s cut to its global growth forecast and you have spoken volumes to an already wary US market that was now eagerly eying any breach of the 200 day S&P 500 moving average (dma), as that had taken the place of the “key reversal” in the hearts and minds of technicians and foisted upon investors as being the gateway to what awaits.

Unfortunately, the message being sent with that technical indicator is a bearish one. While it has been breached on numerous occasions in the past 5 years, the most pronounced and prolonged stay below the 200 dma came in the latter half of 2011, a period when triple digit daily moves were commonplace and volatility was more than double the now nearly 2 year high level.

I miss those days.

As usual, the week’s potential stock selections are classified as being in Traditional, Double Dip Dividend, Momentum or “PEE” categories.

When I first started thinking about a theme for this week’s article I decided to focus on stocks that had already undergone their own personal 10% correction.

That list grew substantially by the time the week came to its close following a brief FOMC induced rally mid-week and that thesis was abandoned.

As trading in the coming week opens at a DJIA level lower than where it began the year, there’s not much reason to start the week with any sense of confidence.

While the S&P 500 is only 5.2% below its recent high, putting it on par with numerous “mini-corrections” over the past two years, you don’t have to do a quantitative assessment to know that this decline feels differently from the others, as volatility is at a two year high point. The sudden appearance of triple digit moves have now gone from the mundane 100 point variety and have added 200 and 300 point ones into the arsenal.

For me, this week may be a little different. Heading into the week I have less cash reserves than I would like and less confidence than I would ordinarily need to dwindle it down further.

While it appears as if there are so many values to be had I would prefer to see some sign of stability before committing resources in my usual buy/write manner. Instead, I may be more likely to add new positions through the sale of out of the money puts, unless there is a dividend involved.

Additionally, while individual stocks may have compelling reasons to consider their purchases, this week I’m less focused on those specific reasons rather than the nature of their recent price declines and the ability to capitalize on the heightened option premiums associated with their recent volatility.

One of the benefits of this rising volatility environment is that option premiums grow as does the uncertainty. The sale of puts and anticipation of the need to rollover those puts in the event of further price erosion may be better suited to an environment of continuing price declines, rather than utilizing a traditional buy/write strategy.

Furthermore, as the premiums become more and more attractive, I find myself more inclined to attempt to rollover positions that might otherwise be assigned, as the accumulation of premiums can offer significant downside protection and reduces the need to find alternative investment candidates.

If you’re looking for a sector that is screaming “correction” you really don’t have to look beyond the Energy Sector. Hearing so many analysts calling for continued
decline in oil prices may be reason enough to begin considering adding positions.

Over the years I’ve lost track of how many times I’ve owned Halliburton (HAL), but other than during the 2008-2009 market crash, the time of the Deepwater Horizon disaster and during the tumultuous market of 2011, there haven’t been such precipitous declines in its price, as it has just plunged below its own 200 dma.

Although Halliburton doesn’t report earnings until the following week, next week’s premiums are reflective of the volatility anticipated. For anyone considering this position through a buy/write one factor to keep in mind is that it will be imperative to rollover the contract if expiration looks likely. That is the case because earnings are reported on the following Monday morning before trading opens so there won’t be a chance to create a hedging position unless done the previous week.

I have been waiting for an opportunity to repurchase shares of Anadarko Petroleum (APC) ever since a bankruptcy judge approved a pollution related settlement, that was part of its years earlier purchase of Kerr-McGee. Like Halliburton, it is now trading below its 200 dma, but it doesn’t report earnings until a week after Halliburton. However, it also offers exceptionally high option premiums as the perceived risk remains heightened in anticipation of further sector weakness.

Owing to its drops the final two days of the previous week, Dow Chemical (DOW) is now also trading below its 200 dma. It, too, is demonstrating an option premium that is substantially higher than has been the case recently, although the risk appears to be considered less than that seen for both Halliburton and Anadarko. With the exception of having received an “outperform” rating those past two days, Dow Chemical appears to have just been caught up in the market’s downturn.

Fastenal (FAST) has traded below its 200 dma since its last earnings report in July 2014 and was not helped by its latest report this past Friday. That was the case despite generally good revenues, but with softer margins that were expected to continue. Unlike the preceding stocks the option premiums are not expanded in reflection of heightened risk. In the event that this position is initiated with a put sale that is likely to be assigned, I would consider taking possession of shares rather than rolling over the puts, as shares go ex-dividend during the November 2014 option cycle.

For a stock whose price hasn’t done very much, eBay (EBAY) has been getting lots and lots of attention and perhaps it is that attention which has prompted it to finally decide to do what so many have suggested, by releasing plans to spin off its PayPal unit. eBay reports earnings this week and is always a prospect to exhibit a sizeable move. It is currently trading below the point that consider the mid-point of the price range that I like to see when considering a new position. As with some other potential earnings trades, it is a candidate for out of the money put sales before earnings or for those more cautious the sale of puts after earnings in the event of a large price drop upon earnings having been released.

Intel (INTC) reports earnings this week after having already been brutalized this past week along with the rest of the chip sector. Most recently I discussed some hesitancy regarding a position in Intel because it had two price gaps higher in the past few months. However, thanks to the past week it has now erased one of those price gaps that represented additional risk. As with Fastenal there is an upcoming ex-dividend date that may be a consideration in any potential trade.

Following YUM Brands’ (YUM) earnings report last week, many over-reacted during after hours trading and shares quickly recovered to end the following day higher, perhaps buoyed by the enthusiasm following the FOMC Statement. Shares did trend lower the rest of the week, but fared much better than the overall market. This coming week YUM Brands is ex-dividend and based upon its option premium is a veritable sea of calm, although it too is demonstrating growth in premiums as risk is generally heightened.

Finally, Best Buy (BBY) is one of those stocks that has seen its own personal correction, having fallen nearly 13% since the market high just 3 weeks ago. With so much attention having been placed on European concerns it’s hard to think of too many stocks that are so well shielded from some of those perceived risks. Although it doesn’t report earnings for more than a month, this is a position that I would like to maintain for an extended period of time, particularly with its currently bloated option premiums, heading into earnings, which I believe will reflect an improving discretionary spending environment, to Best Buy’s benefit.

Unless of course the muzzle falls off, in which case all bets are off for this week.

Traditional Stocks: Anadarko Petroleum, Dow Chemical, Fastenal, Halliburton

Momentum: Best Buy

Double Dip Dividend: YUM Brands (10/15)

Premiums Enhanced by Earnings: eBay (10/15 AM), Intel (10/14 PM)

Remember, these are just guidelines for the coming week. The above selections may become actionable, most often coupling a share purchase with call option sales or the sale of covered put contracts, in adjustment to and consideration of market movements. The overriding objective is to create a healthy income stream for the week with reduction of trading risk.

Week in Review – October 6 – 10, 2014

 

Option to Profit Week in Review
October 6 – 10,  2014
 
NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED
2 / 2 2 6 0  / 0 2  / 0 0

    

Weekly Up to Date Performance

October 6 – 10, 2014

New purchases for the week beat both the unadjusted and adjusted S&P 500 by 1.5% during a week that finally had everyone noticing the back and forth movements of regularity of triple digit moves, now expanding to levels of 200 and 300 points.

However, that is simply in relative terms, as those new positions still fell by 1.6% as compared to the S&P 500, which was 3.1% lower for the week, as the DJIA actually finished below 2013’s close.

It was a week of little news other than the FOMC and some more errant words from Mario Draghi.

That changed Friday afternoon with some credit warnings in Europe, including downgrades of Finnish and French debt.

With no assignments this week performance of closed positions were unchanged from last week and continued to out-perform the S&P 500 performance by 1.7%. They were up 3.5% out-performing the market by 91.8%. 

This was another awful week from most perspectives, if not all.

The only potential positive spin is that Friday ended up on a negative note, which was probably better than an advance, having come off the previous day’s 300+ point decline.

While most analysts and technicians don’t agree on much, they generally do agree that large gains coming on the heels of large losses don’t have any positive meaning. They prefer to see blow-out kind of declines, sort of like getting it out of your system.

The exception is when the gain represents a “key reversal,” and we all know how well that predictive tool worked out.

That kind of further large decline may be the sort of thing that may be in store on Monday, as markets re-open. That’s especially so since the news of the credit downgrades came after  the European markets closed and they haven’t had a chance to respond.

Further, in the US banks are closed for the Columbus Day holiday and that could present some very short term liquidity issues as equity trading goes on as usual.

In some small way I can look to the dividends received this week, which were more than the usual number, and the ability to rollover some positions despite the weakness, as well as the ability to sell some new covered options, as something akin to a positive note.

Somehow, even with a horrible environment there was an opportunity to get 10 OTP trades in for the week.

However, the relative out-performance of positions is of little solace during a week that saw nothing redeeming, other than a brief move higher after release of the FOMC Statement. I suppose it’s nice to have that kind of relative out-performance, but it’s no replacement for the real thing.

After the past 3 weeks are all said and done, the market is down only about 5%, which puts it at the level of most all of the other periodic declines of the past two years. However, it really, really feels like much more because of all of those large moves heading in both directions, but being increasingly a net negative.

For those watching volatility, you may have noticed that before the late sell-off the volatility was rising more than usual given where the day’s change had stood, reflecting the continuing back and forth during the day. Despite having had some of these periodic mini-corrections greater than our current correction, the volatility is now at a two year high, as the back and forth movement continues to be reminiscent of 2011.

If that continues as we head into net week I would envision spending much more time looking for “DOH” trading opportunities. Once the volatility begins to rise those become more and more appealing and can become a primary source of income.

The downside, however, is that they take much more attention and maintenance, as the ideal DOH Trade is one that lasts only for a day or two and sees the contract sold expire worthless. Otherwise you end up chasing the opportunity to rollover the contract in an attempt to avoid being assigned at a strike price that is below your original cost. If you follow my personal trades that’s what happened with some of those trades today.

The positive aspect of the DOH Trades is that during a prolonged downturn it really makes a big difference to be able to squeeze out some premium, particularly as you are able to use strike prices that are generally 2% or more above the current price at the time of the option contract sale, depending on the number of days of contract duration.

While doing so may be a nuisance, it is the kind of nuisance that has me preferring markets that are down trending.

With less cash than I would like at the current market level and despite what look like so many great values, there has to be hesitance about spending any more of the cash reserve down. Ideally, if doing so, it would be in support of other existing positions, such as you might do in cost averaging down, rather than looking for too many new positions.

Still, I don’t expect to actively look for “deals” next week. It’s generally easier to do that when a particular sector or a particular stock is beaten down. It’s much harder to select what may be ready to bounce back when almost everything has been pummeled, so if the market continues in its current pattern the emphasis will be on beginning to generate revenue from existing positions, even if through the use of strike prices below cost.

There are two caveats to all of the above.

One is that with a market moving lower, new positions are often more appropriately entered through the sale of puts and rolling those over, where appropriate or simply taking assignment. So if considering any new positions the sale of puts may be the way to go.

The second caveat regards the DOH trades. 

With a small number of positions set to expire next week as the monthly cycle concludes, I may consider using some expanded weekly option expirations for some potential DOH trades, rather than very short term trades, particularly if there are also upcoming earnings. That would reduce some of their high maintenance and provide more time for any price blips to even out. An example of that might be Las Vegas Sands, which was a DOH trade today and then reports earnings next week. Ideally, the way to enter into that kind of a trade is during a strong price rise and then using a well out of the money strike whose premium will be enhanced by the earnings event.

Otherwise, for now, you’ll be hearing a lot about moving averages the next week and the risk that it presents at a time when people are fleeing from risk. It means nothing except in hindsight. If the 200 DMA proves to be important, you’ll be hearing about it ad nauseum. If not? That will be the end of its mention, just like the “key reversal” has been relegated to the closet.

While the crowd running from risk and an over-reliance on unvalidated technical indicators may normally represent contrarian opportunities, I’m content to wait to see some stability return first.

That’s far more important than a surge higher that only ends up being another in a string of disappointments.

     

This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as as in the summary.below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:   DOW, EMC

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  DOW (10/31), LVS (10/31), WFM (10/31)

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle: none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle: BMY (11/22), PBR (11/22)

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO:  GDX (10/24), LVS (10/10)

Put contracts expired: none

Put contracts rolled over: none

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned: none

Calls Expired:  GPS, HAL

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend PositionsCHK (10/10 $0.09), CPB (10/8 $0.31), DRI (10/8 $0.55), FCX (10/10 $0.31), GPS (10/6 $0.22)

Ex-dividend Positions Next Week:  none

 

 

For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, CHK, CLF, COH, FCX, GDX, GM, GPS, HAL, HFC, .JCP, JOY, K,  LULU, LVS, MCP, MOS,  NEM, RIG, SBGI, TGT, WFM, WLT (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.



Daily Market Update – October 10, 2014

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – October 10, 2014 (8:30 AM)

The Week in Review will be posted by 6 PM tonight and the Weekend Update will be posted by Noon on Sunday.

The following are possible outcomes for today:

Assignments:  none

Rollovers:  EMC

Expirations: WFM, DOW, GPS, HAL

 

The following were ex-dividend this week: GPS (10/6 $0.22), CPB (10/8 $0.31), DRI (10/8 $0.55), CHK (10/10 $0.09), FCX (10/10 $0.31)

There are currently no ex-dividend positions for next week

 

Trades, if any, will be attempted to be made by 3:30 PM EDT

 

 

Daily Market Update – October 9, 2014 (Close)

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – October 9, 2014 (Close)

It’s almost a little eerie when one day can go down 272 points and the next day can go up 274 points.

Of course when the third day see prospects of a 300 point decline it gets a little tiresome. Even if you do like the idea of volatility rising the process can really be painful.

While yesterday’s rebound was definitely welcome there’s still no escaping the historical significance of such large upward moves. They tend to occur during market downtrends and aren’t generally parts of the building blocks that take markets higher in a sustained fashion.

The October 2007 to March 2009 period was filled with those kind of days and if you can remember back to those days how many times did you think “finally, we’re done with all of the selling”?

There was a lot of talk about how yesterday represented a “key reversal” day.

That’s one where the market opens lower than the previous day, then moves to a new low, before reversing course to close higher than the previous day’s high.

There was a lot of talk about it because many see it as a very bullish sign, although like so many such signs it’s not as valid as many would like to believe. In fact, Thomas Bulkowski, who extensively studies chart patterns has reported that about 51% of the time that a key reversal occurs during a market downtrend, such as we’re currently experiencing, the trend continues downward after the  key reversal.

I don’t know if he’s right, but somebody is wrong when it comes to the significance of the exalted key reversal.

Still, yesterday was welcome as we head into the final days of the week and always hopeful for some combination of assignments and rollovers.

One of those hopes, The Gap, got dashed yesterday after the close, as its CEO unexpectedly announced hos retirement, saying he was unable to commit anew to the time being asked of him.

That’s a very bizarre reason, but more bizarre has been the immediate reaction to the announcement, particularly considering that there was nothing terribly spectacular about the CEO or his performance. If anything, during his reign, The Gap has been incredibly inconsistent in its performance and certainly not a stellar retail performer.

The market may be reacting to uncertainty over the real reasons for his sudden departure. The after hours response came before The Gap released its monthly same store sales, which were flat, but did indicate an increase in expenses, which ordinarily would probably have caused some drop in shares in the aftermarket. However, in the past, The Gap has typically made initial 5% moves in either direction upon same store sales, although often quickly reversing the initial reactions. This time, it’s a 10% move in the absence of significant same store sales news.

So that will be one to watch and weather as we await the real story.

For the morning there didn’t appear to be a follow through forthcoming to yesterday’s gains, although precious metals were showing a large bounce after prolonged selling. As often is the case, there’s no readily apparent reason for doing so other than the possibility that those inclined to trade precious metals suddenly believe that the selling was overdone, perhaps buoyed a bit by yesterday’s FOMC.

While I would have liked to see the same thing in today’s equity market, it’s a good thing that I didn’t hold my breath. I would have been happy with some stability in  prices and simply a little respite from a large move opposite to yesterday’s in an effort to see those positions set to expire tomorrow either be assigned or rolled over.

That wasn’t asking for too much, but today’s sell off was really over the top and again had no real reason for being, no matter how much people point once again at Martio Draghi for calling for economic reform from European leaders.

So while I was hoping to get some rollovers either done today or be in better position to do so, it was a repeat of last Thursday when the possibility was also made less likely.

Last week Friday’s strong gain salvaged the week, but I’m not so positive about the same happening tomorrow, as today was beginning to feel a little more like a blow off kind of sale, but still didn’t reach that level.

As far as rollovers go,  you may have noticed that with, what may be a temporary increase in volatility, I’ve taken the opportunity to take advantage of some improving premiums in forward weeks by rolling over to periods other then the next coming week. That offers a little extra bit of diversification and reduces dependency on a single week, which can easily be subject to a sudden adverse price movement.

With a few positions already set to expire next week, I may look for tomorrow’s rollover opportunities beyond that monthly cycle end date to further add to that spreading of risk, if possible.

December anyone?

 

Daily Market Update – October 9, 2014

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – October 9, 2014 (8:30 AM)

It’s almost a little eerie when one day can go down 272 points and the next day can go up 274 points.

While yesterday’s rebound was definitely welcome there’s still no escaping the historical significance of such large upward moves. They tend to occur during market downtrends and aren’t generally parts of the building blocks that take markets higher in a sustained fashion.

The October 2007 to March 2009 period was filled with those kind of days and if you can remember back to those days how many times did you think “finally, we’re done with all of the selling”?

There was a lot of talk about how yesterday represented a “key reversal” day.

That’s one where the market opens lower than the previous day, then moves to a new low, before reversing course to close higher than the previous day’s high.

There was a lot of talk about it because many see it as a very bullish sign, although like so many such signs it’s not as valid as many would like to believe. In fact, Thomas Bulkowski, who extensively studies chart patterns has reported that about 51% of the time that a key reversal occurs during a market downtrend, such as we’re currently experiencing, the trend continues downward after the  key reversal.

I don’t know if he’s right, but somebody is wrong when it comes to the significance of the exalted key reversal.

Still, yesterday was welcome as we head into the final days of the week and always hopeful for some combination of assignments and rollovers.

One of those hopes, The Gap, got dashed yesterday after the close, as its CEO unexpectedly announced hos retirement, saying he was unable to commit anew to the time being asked of him.

That’s a very bizarre reason, but more bizarre has been the immediate reaction to the announcement, particularly considering that there was nothing terribly spectacular about the CEO or his performance. If anything, during his reign, The Gap has been incredibly inconsistent in its performance and certainly not a stellar retail performer.

The market may be reacting to uncertainty over the real reasons for his sudden departure. The after hours response came before The Gap released its monthly same store sales, which were flat, but did indicate an increase in expenses, which ordinarily would probably have caused some drop in shares in the aftermarket. However, in the past, The Gap has typically made initial 5% moves in either direction upon same store sales, although often quickly reversing the initial reactions. This time, it’s a 10% move in the absence of significant same store sales news.

So that will be one to watch and weather as we await the real story.

For the morning there doesn’t appear to be a follow through forth
coming to yesterday’s gains, although precious metals are showing a large bounce after prolonged selling. As often is the case, there’s no readily apparent reason for doing so other than the possibility that those inclined to trade precious metals suddenly believe that the selling was overdone, perhaps buoyed a bit by yesterday’s FOMC.

While I’d like to see the same thing in today’s equity market, I’m not going to hold my breath. Instead, I’d be happy with some stability in  prices and a little respite from a large move opposite to yesterday’s in an effort to see those positions set to expire tomorrow either be assigned or rolled over.

As far as rollovers go,  you may have noticed that with, what may be a temporary increase in volatility, I’ve taken the opportunity to take advantage of some improving premiums in forward weeks by rolling over to periods other then the next coming week. That offers a little extra bit of diversification and reduces dependency on a single week, which can easily be subject to a sudden adverse price movement.

With a few positions already set to expire next week, I may look for today and tomorrow’s rollover opportunities beyond that monthly cycle end date to further add to that spreading of risk, if possible.