Week in Review – March 10 -14, 2014

 

Option to Profit Week in Review
March 10 – 14, 2014
 
NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED
4 / 5 1 5 3 / 0 6  / 0 0

    

Weekly Up to Date Performance

March 10 – 14, 2014

New purchases lagged the time adjusted  S&P 500 this week by 0.3% and matched the unadjusted index, both languishing for the week.

The market showed an adjusted loss for the week of 1.6% and adjusted loss of 2.0% for the week, while new positions lost 2.0%.

Existing positions performed surprisingly well actually outperforming the market by 0.4%, but they, too lost ground. Just not as much.

That may be the best I can say about things this week.

Although, for positions positions closed in 2014, performance exceeded that of the S&P 500 by 1.5%. They were up 3.3% out-performing the market by 80%. Whereas I know that this figure will come down at some point, I don’t mind being able to continually look at it in an attempt to make me feel good about things while I can.

I knew there was something that I didn’t like about this week.

Besides the obvious, it turns out that this was the first week in which every day was a loser since May 2012.

That was also the last time we had a meaningful correction, although even that didn’t meet the usual definition.

This wasn’t a very good week in so many ways, but adding far too many positions into the “uncovered” category is always the worst, from my perspective. Stocks go up and stocks go down, but a week in which a stock isn’t generating some kind of income is a lost week and is never truly re-captured.

Additionally, more new positions were added than old positions were assigned, going counter to my goal of slowly reducing the total number of positions managed in the portfolio.

And let’s not forget, despite out-performing the market, there was still a net loss for the week.

No wonder my wife won’t talk to me.

On another positive note,  because I do have to occasionally be delusional, there was a nice flow of dividends again this week and at least some money will be returned to the coffers following assignment of an all too small number of positions.

The odd part is that I’m actually reasonably bullish about next week and have more than the usual number of potential stock selections on my preliminary list.

Part of the optimism certainly isn’t related to events, but it is related to the charts that I pretend to rarely refer to for guidance.

In this case, after some initial glances that will likely call for a bit more in-depth thought, is the chart of the Volatility Index, which may be indicating a temporary downswing in momentum and markets.

More on that in the Weekend Update, if warranted.

While there wasn’t too much positive for the week there were at least some opportunities to roll over some positions. However, as I discussed earlier in the week much of my own activity was focused on the sale of puts and I may look to increase that activity as part of regular Trading Alerts, as long as there appears to be some thought that there may be over-sold conditions in the development phase, as I believe we are currently trapped within.

That explains the Trading Alert sale of Twitter puts late in the session on Friday.

With a little bit of cash generated and still some uncertainty related to external events I don’t plan on plunging into markets on Monday morning. However, I think there may still be reasonable opportunities, as long as minor details like New York State Attorney General’s Office choosing to investigate any of my selections doesn’t occur too often.

On another potentially positive note and getting back to the topic of volatility, there has been a rise this week, as you would expect when markets are dropping.

That kind of increased volatility is a better environment for DOH Trades, to be certain and as there are uncovered positions there is more opportunity to look for those kind of trades, but again remembering that they tend to require greater vigilance and a little bit of prayer, too, such as may have helped Target to get back below $60.

Today that volatility worked a little bit against us as the premiums to buy back options in attempts to roll over reflected increased expectations for continued drops even during the remaining hours of today’s session. However, next week’s premiums were already beginning to show some increases related to increased uncertainty.

With a dozen position set to expire next week and seeing increased premiums may bring opportunity to finally return to the strategy of staggering expirations by time in order to get some better diversification and protection from a sudden movement in either direction.

In the meantime we can just sit back and see whether any events unfold this weekend that will set the tone for us on Monday morning. Although the market closed the week with a loss, the fact that the loss was really pretty mild going into such a weekend ewither indicates that traders are delusional or there’s little being signaled to fuel worries.

Either one of those is fine by me.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

     

This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as as in the summary.below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:  C, CHK, GM, MPS

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle:   CHK, MSFT, WFM

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  MOS, TGT

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO:  WFM

Put contracts sold and still open: TWTR

Put contracts expired: none

Put contract rolled over: none

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  COH, KSS, SBUX

Calls Expired: AIG, APC, C, FDO, IP, VZ

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions:  APC (3/10 $0.18), KSS (3/10 $0.39), NEM (3/11 $0.15), HFC (3/12 $0.30), FDO (3/12 $0.31), GM (3/14 $0.30)

 

 

.

 

 



For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, AIG, APC, C, CSCO, CLF, COP, DRI, FCXFDO,  IP, JCP,  LULU, MCP, MOS,  MRO, NEM, PBR, PM, RIG,  VZ, WLT (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.



Daily Market Update – March 14, 2014

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – March 14, 2014 (9:00 AM)

The Week in Review will be posted by 6 PM and the Weekend Update will be posted by noon on Sunday.

Today’s possible outcomes include:

 

Assignments: SBUX

RolloversCHK, COH, KSS, MSFT

Expirations:  AIG, APC, C, FDO, IP, MOS, VZ, WFM

 

Trades, if any will be attempted to be made before 3:30 PM EDT, where possible.

 

 

 

 

 

Daily Market Update – March 13, 2014 (Close)

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – March 13, 2014 (Close)

This was already shaping up like another shapeless day before the distasteful afternoon occured, but at least the morning brought us closer to the end of what has not been a terribly good week, principally due to some poorly timed new positions. They not only faltered with a teetering market, but like General Motors, brought their own problems to the table.

As the afternoon unfolded the week only got worse as it was really anyone’s guess as to what caused the sell-off, although Crimean rumors caught some blame, as did more moaning about the Chinese economy being worse than thought.

For the first time that I can recall, this has been a week that I’ve made more personal trades than recommended trades. While that includes a trade in Cypress Semiconductor, the other trades were all put sales, none of which were included as Trading Alerts. 

That adds to my characterization of this week.

The Cypress Semiconductor trade was was never sent as an alert because it appeared as if I had gotten the last person willing to buy contracts at $0.20, the price I thought necessary to make it a worthwhile trade. For those that occasionally check “market depth” to see what the outstanding offers are at various prices, at the time my trade was executed there was no shortage of bids at $0.20, but literally as my trade was filled and right before sending that alert I watched the market depth indicate that all of those $0.20 bids were gone and instead replaced by $0.10 bids or nothing at all, despite the fact that the share price was unchanged or even $0.01 higher.

A couple of days later that $0.20 still hasn’t come back even though shares have gotten more expensive.

Back to the puts.

One of my reasons for being more reluctant to recommend the sale of puts is that I know that not all brokerage firms, including Scottrade, allows the sale of cash covered puts.

I know that some subscribers use that brokerage and while I don’t understand the basis for not allowing that kind of trade, as the alternative, buying shares and selling calls isn’t always an equal alternative. A cash covered put is no more of a risky trade, neither to the investor nor to the brokerage than a similar buy/write trade. The money is simply held in escrow by the brokerage until it’s absolutely certain that it won’t be needed to purchase the underlying security because of assignment.

There must be a reason and it must be for someone’s protection, but I still don’t understand, particularly since that need to protect someone doesn’t appear to be very universally appreciated by other brokerages.

Additionally, I tend to sell puts following some bad news and a precipitous drop in share price. That immediately is a more risky situation as for many stocks that first big move is the beginning of a new momentum that may carry it further in the same direction.

Selling the puts is a statement of bullish sentiment in the belief that the move won’t be continued to the level of the selected option strike. What often makes that kind of trade appealing is that the premium is enhanced because of the initial large move and emotion takes over as the supply/demand curve is shifted because people believe that momentum will continue.

While adherents of the belief that big moves beget more big moves in the same direction or even continued and sustained movement in the same direction, there are plenty of examples where that’s just not the case.

Although many refer to dead cat bounces and dismiss them as being meaningless in the big picture in terms of changing direction, the reality is that what really matters is the time frame with which one looks to create a specific outcome.

While a dead cat bounce may not mean much for the prospects of a stock or even an entire market looking months forward it may certainly buy some time until expiration a few days later.

My own use of puts has evolved over the years. To some degree it does require a modification of the thought process as the concept isn’t always intuitive. After all, most of us think in terms of good happening when shares go higher.

With puts the good can occur with both lower and higher moves, with the latter being simply a question of degree.

Additionally, the common belief is that if you sell a put and shares fall below the strike price you will be assigned shares.

The reality is that if the market exists and at prices that are attractive enough you can roll over the puts in an effort to continue to generate option premium and buy time for your hoped for rebound in price.

However, the further reluctance in recommending put sales very often is that often the rollover, if necessary, involves some wide bid and ask spreads and really works best when the trader executes the trade as a spread, rather than individually executing the BTC and STO legs of the trade.

Deciding on the appropriate NC (Net Credit) may appear daunting when the spreads are wide, but is actually fairly simple and uses the following formula:

STO bid price minus BTC ask price plus average of BTC bid – ask difference plus STO bid – ask difference.

Or you could just follow the NC that I provide, to make it even more simple.

The reason that I put all of this down is that I am probably going to make more put sale Trading Alerts, where it appears appropriate in the future as market conditions may warrant that additional strategy to not be overlooked.

For those that can’t sell put contracts, contact me to see if there is an equivalent buy/write alternative.

Today, however, did point out how momentum can build on itself as the market just kept going lower once it made it to a triple digit less. The next 150 points lower were far easier than the first 100. Having chosen to start testing the market when it was down 100 may often make sense, whether doing so via buy/writes or the sale of puts.

But not today.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daily Market Update – March 13, 2014

 

  

 

Daily Market Update – March 13, 2014 (9:30 AM)

This is already shaping up like another shapeless day, but at least that brings us closer to the end of what has not been a terribly good week, principally due to some poorly timed new positions. They not only faltered with a teetering market, but like General Motors, brought their own problems to the table.

For the first time that I can recall, this has been a week that I’ve made more personal trades than recommended trades. While that includes a trade in Cypress Semiconductor, the other trades were all put sales, none of which were included as Trading Alerts. 

That adds to my characterization of this week.

The Cypress Semiconductor trade was was never sent as an alert because it appeared as if I had gotten the last person willing to buy contracts at $0.20, the price I thought necessary to make it a worthwhile trade. For those that occasionally check “market depth” to see what the outstanding offers are at various prices, at the time my trade was executed there was no shortage of bids at $0.20, but literally as my trade was filled and right before sending that alert I watched the market depth indicate that all of those $0.20 bids were gone and instead replaced by $0.10 bids or nothing at all, despite the fact that the share price was unchanged or even $0.01 higher.

A couple of days later that $0.20 still hasn’t come back even though shares have gotten more expensive.

Back to the puts.

One of my reasons for being more reluctant to recommend the sale of puts is that I know that not all brokerage firms, including Scottrade, allows the sale of cash covered puts.

I know that some subscribers use that brokerage and while I don’t understand the basis for not allowing that kind of trade, as the alternative, buying shares and selling calls isn’t always an equal alternative.

Additionally, I tend to sell puts following some bad news and a precipitous drop in share price. That immediately is a more risky situation as for many stocks that first big move is the beginning of a new momentum that may carry it further in the same direction.

Selling the puts is a statement of bullish sentiment in the belief that the move won’t be continued to the level of the selected option strike. What often makes that kind of trade appealing is that the premium is enhanced because of the initial large move and emotion takes over as the supply/demand curve is shifted because people believe that momentum will continue.

While adherents of the belief that big moves beget more big moves in the same direction or even continued and sustained movement in the same direction, there are plenty of examples where that’s just not the case.

Although many refer to dead cat bounces and dismiss them as being meaningless in the big picture in terms of changing direction, the reality is that what really matters is the time frame with which one looks to create a specific outcome.

While a dead cat bounce may not mean much for the prospects of a stock or even an entire market looking months forward it may certainly buy some time until expiration a few days later.

My own use of puts has evolved over the years. To some degree it does require a modification of the thought process as the concept isn’t always intuitive. After all, most of us think in terms of good happening when shares go higher.

With puts the good can occur with both lower and higher moves, with the latter being simply a question of degree.

Additionally, the common belief is that if you sell a put and shares fall below the strike price you will be assigned shares.

The reality is that if the market exists and at prices that are attractive enough you can roll over the puts in an effort to continue to generate option premium and buy time for your hoped for rebound in price.

However, the further reluctance in recommending put sales very often is that often the rollover, if necessary, involves some wide bid and ask spreads and really works best when the trader executes the trade as a spread, rather than individually executing the BTC and STO legs of the trade.

Deciding on the appropriate NC (Net Credit) may appear daunting when the spreads are wide, but is actually fairly simple and uses the following formula:

STO bid price minus BTC ask price plus average of BTC bid – ask difference plus STO bid – ask difference.

Or you could just follow the NC that I provide, to make it even more simple.

The reason that I put all of this down is that I am probably going to make more put sale Trading Alerts, where it appears appropriate in the future as market conditions may warrant that additional strategy to not be overlooked.

For those that can’t sell put contracts, contact me to see if there is an equivalent buy/write alternative.