Daily Market Update – April 14, 2014 (Close)

 

 

Daily Market Update – April 14, 2014 (Close)

There was lots of nervousness over the weekend as concerns centered on Russian intentions over eastern Ukraine.

Since that was clearly an identified risk factor during Friday’s trading no one would have blamed traders for really accelerating the selling that was already a follow through to Thursday’s sell-off.

But it didn’t happen that way despite a very large order imbalance that should have driven the market even lower at the close of trading.

I suppose that could be taken as some sort of positive sign, but I’m more focused on personal issues.

Because what also didn’t happen was assignments of shares to help re-supply cash reserves.

When assignments occur I feel emboldened and anxious to recycle that cash and put it to work making more cash. While emboldened on the one hand, I’m also cautious about dipping deeper into reserves when the assignments are fewer than expected.

They couldn’t possibly have been any fewer than this past week, thanks to about a 400 point drop to end the week.

Maybe this week will be different?

While Citigroup, which shamefully couldn’t pass the regulator’s stress tests just a couple of weeks ago has started the pre-market off on a positive note, with what appear to be genuinely good earnings, it will be a matter of wait and see.

I want the market to be able to prove itself worthy of opening new positions, but I think that if it does, I would be much happier being able to sell calls on existing positions. I would rather generate the week’s income stream in that manner instead of by buying new positions, even if there appear to be some bargains after last week’s indiscriminate and somewhat irrational rise and then fall.

As the market does open it will be interesting to see where the volatility moves and whether there is any enhancement of forward week option premiums. If I had the opportunity to find cover for existing positions my preference would be to go out into forward weeks, but a beggar shouldn’t be a chooser. I would happily take what I could get.

As with past weeks I’ll likely watch during the first hour to see whether the Citigroup bump has any legs, as early optimism has frequently given way to an excuse to sell and close positions often after the first hour of trading.

Today, and you can look at this as a positive or a negative, it took until the final hour to reverse what had been a gain of Janet Yellen proportions. But if you are looking for positive or negative signals, the rebound back in the final 30 minutes after losing almost all of the gain has to be some kind of a positive sign. It’s actually hard to remember the last time anything like that had happened.

Usually these surprises leave you poorer.

Someone was optimistic. Whether that lasts until tomorrow may be questionable, but yu have to start and take a stance somewhere.

For those who believe that late last week’s selling was related to raising money from last year’s capital gains in order to meet tax payments, the expectation would be that markets would begin climbing higher as those money raising sales are completed. Of course, it really has to be new money that drives a market higher. It can’t simply be recycling. So if people had to sell stocks to pay their taxes it’s not too likely that on the day after those taxes are paid that they would suddenly have new funds to infuse into the markets.

If the markets do reverse this quick 4% drop it will simply be because the drop itself had neither rational, technical, nor a fundamental basis. It wasn’t even based on fear or uncertainty, so there’s every bit as much reason for it to return to advancing as there is for it continuing to go lower.

Today it just decided to do both. That’s all.

 

 

Daily Market Update – April 14, 2014

 

 

Daily Market Update – April 14, 2014 (9:15 AM)

There was lots of nervousness over the weekend as concerns centered on Russian intentions over eastern Ukraine.

Since that was clearly an identified risk factor during Friday’s trading no one would have blamed traders for really accelerating the selling that was already a follow through to Thursday’s sell-off.

But it didn’t happen that way despite a very large order imbalance that should have driven the market even lower at the close of trading.

I suppose that could be taken as some sort of positive sign, but I’m more focused on personal issues.

Because what also didn’t happen was assignments of shares to help re-supply cash reserves.

When assignments occur I feel emboldened and anxious to recycle that cash and put it to work making more cash. While emboldened on the one hand, I’m also cautious about dipping deeper into reserves when the assignments are fewer than expected.

They couldn’t possibly have been any fewer than this past week, thanks to about a 400 point drop to end the week.

Maybe this week will be different?

While Citigroup, which shamefully couldn’t pass the regulator’s stress tests just a couple of weeks ago has started the pre-market off on a positive note, with what appear to be genuinely good earnings, it will be a matter of wait and see.

I want the market to be able to prove itself worthy of opening new positions, but I think that if it does, I would be much happier being able to sell calls on existing positions. I would rather generate the week’s income stream in that manner instead of by buying new positions, even if there appear to be some bargains after last week’s indiscriminate and somewhat irrational rise and then fall.

As the market does open it will be interesting to see where the volatility moves and whether there is any enhancement of forward week option premiums. If I had the opportunity to find cover for existing positions my preference would be to go out into forward weeks, but a beggar shouldn’t be a chooser. I would happily take what I could get.

As with past weeks I’ll likely watch during the first hour to see whether the Citigroup bump has any legs, as early optimism has frequently given way to an excuse to sell and close positions.

For those who believe that the selling was related to raising money from last year’s capital gains in order to meet tax payments, the expectation would be that markets would begin climbing higher as those money raising sales are completed. Of course, it really has to be new money that drives a market higher. It can’t simply be recycling. So if people had to sell stocks to pay their taxes it’s not too likely that on the day after those taxes are paid that they would suddenly have new funds to infuse into the markets.

If the markets do reverse this quick 4% drop it will simply be because the drop itself had neither rational, technical, nor a fundamental basis. It wasn’t even based on fear or uncertainty, so there’s every bit as much reason for it to return to advancing as there is for it continuing to go lower.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dashboard – April 14 – 18, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

MONDAY:   Early indications show no follow through to late last week, but no bounce back either. My primary goal this week is to raise cash through assignments, sell calls and be better positioned to start the May 2014 cycle, rather than opening too many new positions.

TUESDAY:     Great late recovery yesterday may be the story of the week. That has to inspire some confidence and even more confusion.

WEDNESDAY:  Another impressive previous day’s close, but this time there looks to be early follow through, hopefully enough to bring us closer to rollovers and assignments to round out a diminshed new position week.

THURSDAY:    An early end to the week may get off on a slightly negative note, but after a week of pleasant surprises, anything is possible to end this monthly option cycle.

FRIDAY

 

 



                                                                                                                                           

 

 

 





 “SNEAK PEEK AT NEXT WEEK” APPEARS ON FRIDAYS

Sneak Peek

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

Weekend Update – April 13, 2014

Volatility is back!

Barely a month ago there was much talk about rising volatility in the face of a declining market. Those that would tend to use charts to predict the future suggested that the then rise in volatility was the precursor of the correction we had all been expecting.

Now we’re at it again.

A month ago there were clearly identified catalysts that were weighing heavily on the markets. Disappointing economic news from China coupled with the unfolding crisis in Crimea mixed the economic realm with the geo-political one.

However, back then it appeared that the rise in volatility may have been reminiscent of previous smaller “mini-VIX” rises that occurred on a regular basis, nestled between larger rises that also came on a regular basis.

As it turned out, that was precisely the case, as the volatility rise seen at that time quickly gave way and the market did what it has repeatedly done over the past 18 months. It simply recovered from short lived setbacks and went on to new highs.

An extension of the chart presented last month to illustrate the cyclic nature of the “maxi-VIX and mini-VIX” pattern shows that would was a possible “mini-VIX” in the making turned out to be exactly that and as short lived as its predecessors and its rise ended at a level right where previous smaller VIX rises had ended.

Now, the question has evolved into whether the current rise in volatility is part of a developing “maxi-VIX” formation. The timing is right and certainly few would disagree that it has been a long time since we’ve had a downward move that could be classified as a “correction.”

The significance, of course, is that the market tends to go lower as volatility rises. While people may disagree as to whether volatility is predictive in nature or simply a by product of events, it does paint a picture of the health of markets.

The glaring difference between this month’s rise and that of last month is that there are no obvious catalysts, although that would never stop those from offering hypotheses.

The past week saw a 600 point reversal in the DJIA in the latter half of the week. That move was framed in the context of elation tied to an FOMC that appeared to be supportive of continued lower interest rates to the fears that interest rates would rise.

It was a week that saw clear flight to safety before the elation and “risk on” behavior the very next day, which then gave way to universal flight.

Whatever the cause for the abrupt turnaround it did validate the old aphorism that you shouldn’t count your chickens before they’re hatched, as this past week was a rare one in which I had no positions assigned, after having already plotted exactly how I would be spending all of that money that at mid-week I knew would be pouring in from assignments.

While the coming week may have even more of the “bargains” that have been lacking lately, I’m neither as anxious to commit toward their ownership nor do I have as much in my cash reserves as I would like to really capitalize on opportunities.

If a “maxi-VIX” pattern is in the making it would be reasonable to expect even lower prices in the coming weeks. Although this past week was fairly dreadful, mitigated somewhat by hedging positions, the 4.1% decline from the recent high is still far from satisfying the expectations of those awaiting a standard correction. I’ve been waiting for one of those so long that I may also learn the truth of another aphorism and learn to regret what I had been wishing for.

The potential benefit of increasing volatility for the option seller is that premiums are likely to perk up and that may especially become apparent for the longer term options, such as for the standard monthly variety. During a period of uncertainty the use of longer term contracts can help to ride out any near term weakness while paying you to wait.

While the aphorism “there’s no such thing as a free lunch,” may be true, at least the premiums from those option sales offer a bit of a discount.

As usual, the week’s potential stock selections are classified as being in Traditional, Double Dip Dividend, Momentum and “PEE” categories..

In a week that was fairly indiscriminate in which stock was dragged lower the one that really received my attention was one that I was certain would be assigned on Friday. MetLife (MET) was one of those that fell victim to fears of rising interest rates and fell more sharply than it had risen on the immediately preceding belief that rates would remain low. Whether the elation or the fears were warranted sometimes it is possible to simply have an overly exaggerated reaction and MetLife had them in both directions during the week as it went along for the rides. Any respite in interest rate theories, regardless of what direction, should allow MetLife to show some stability, which in the past has made it an excellent covered option position.

Perhaps it’s just an unintended juxtaposition that would have discussion of the merits of an insurance company precede discussion of Lorillard (LO). Since Lorillard only offers monthly option contracts I’m especially drawn to it during the final week of a monthly cycle or before an ex-dividend date. In this case it’s the former, but it’s appeal goes beyond the time of month. Potentially in play as a take over target die to its reported lead in the e-cigarette area, much of that premium in its price has now been discounted, due to the tangled web of relationships between the various tobacco companies. Instead, Lorillard is simply a cash machine that is seeking to expand its user base, despite denials of that strategy.

Of course, while e-cigarettes may or may not enhance the need for fastidious oral hygiene, the real thing does and while Colgate Palmolive certainly makes products other than toothpaste, as a one time Pediatric Dentist, that’s the one that I can readily associate with Colgate. What I can also associate with shares is its dividend and potential refuge for those seeking safety. It goes ex-dividend this week and offers an attractive premium. The single caveat is that shares are trading near the yearly highs and earnings are reported the following week. However, as with some other positions being considered this week, there is added reason to consider the sale of May 2014 option contracts to secure additional premium and insulate oneself s a little from near term market weakness.

In retail, The Gap (GPS) and L Brands (LB) frequently infuriate me and delight me, respectively.

The Gap is yet another company that I had expected to be assigned this past week. For some reason it continues to provide monthly same store sales statistics and for me, their timing is usually less than fortuitous. However, The Gap always seems to have a way of reversing the disappointments and has been a very reliable covered option trade, despite the histrionics displayed by an investing community that interprets each month’s worth of data as being reflective of the company’s prospects in perpetuity.

L Brands, on the other hand is a company that simply executes among its various brands, although it, too, provides those comparable sales statistics. Down about 8% in the past week in part as a result of lower same store sales, L Brands is a company that I frequently like to consider owning during the final week of a monthly option cycle, as with Lorillard, particularly if its price has moderated. A nice dividend, good option premiums and reliable management is a good combination, especially when the market itself can’t be trusted to act rationally.

Best Buy (BBY), while certainly a volatile stock over the past few years has lately settled into somewhat of a comfort zone, punctuated by flights higher and lower. While I may not want to be holding shares in advance of earnings, that is still 5 weeks away and in the interim there’s not too much reason to believe that it will be disrupted for long from its recent path. After weakness last week it’s price is at the lower end of that range and seems to be offering a good entry point even in a rocky market.

Among those reporting earnings this week are Yahoo (YHOO) and SanDisk (SNDK).

Yahoo has fallen about 15% in the past month and it’s not likely that they will be in a position to blame the winter weather for their quarterly results. Other than the promise of riches from its piece of Ali Baba which will be coming public, it’s hard to know what drives Yahoo forward, just as it’s hard to know whether its CEO, Marissa Mayer, warrants accolades for any initiatives that are increasingly difficult to categorize. A weakening IPO market may disproportionately impact Yahoo share prospects and would certainly detract from Mayer’s scorecard.

With the option market implying an approximate 7% earnings related move in shares, there may be some opportunity in the sale of puts outside of that range, but the opportunities, that is the risk/reward balance would be more enticing if the overall market was not in continued deterioration.

SanDisk, on the other hand is also seeing an implied move of 7%, however, it does offer a slightly improved reward for the risk. Perhaps more importantly, in contrast to Yahoo, its strategic direction is clear. While Yahoo passively rescued itself from oblivion through its Ali Baba stake, SanDisk rescued itself from the oblivion of commoditization through active and creative product development. Since shares also go ex-dividend later in the month, if making this earnings trade through the sale of puts and being faced with assignment, I might consider that possibility, whereas ordinarily I would seek to roll over puts and await a price turnaround and subsequent exit from the position via expiration.

Finally, to me it almost seems ironic that during a week that saw a less than gracious welcome for IPO offerings, one of the most recently memorable disappointing IPOs, that may have signaled a market top comes to mind. Blackstone (BX) reports earnings this week and has been increasingly responsible for this era’s new initial public offerings. This week, for example, La Quinta (LQ) went public again to less than enthusiastic demand. The cynical might suggest that Blackstone’s use of the IPO process for its own properties is an example of opportunism at its very finest and might suggest that a market top is in the vicinity.

To that I would argue that opportunism at its finest is when you use IPO proceeds to completely cash out. While that may not currently be the case, one does have to wonder whether there will be enough dinghies for all of us once we come to realize what Blackstone has in the past so well demonstrated that it is capable of doing.

Meanwhile, as opposed to many earnings related  trades that I would make via the sale of put contracts and prefer to execute only as part of a very short lived strategy, Blackstone is one that I could envision a longer relationship. While in general reluctant to take possession of shares if put to me, Blackstone is one that is far more than a vehicle to exploit excesses in option premiums.

Traditional Stocks: L Brands, Lorillard, MetLife, The Gap

Momentum Stocks: Best Buy

Double Dip Dividend: Colgate Palmolive (ex-div 4/17)

Premiums Enhanced by Earnings: SanDisk (4/16 PM), Yahoo (4/15 PM)

Remember, these are just guidelines for the coming week. The above selections may become actionable, most often coupling a share purchase with call option sales or the sale of covered put contracts, in adjustment to and consideration of market movements. The overriding objective is to create a healthy income stream for the week with reduction of trading risk.

Week in Review – April 7 – 11, 2014

 

Option to Profit Week in Review
April 7 – 11, 2014
 
NEW POSITIONS/STO NEW STO ROLLOVERS CALLS ASSIGNED/PUTS EXPIRED CALLS EXPIRED/PUTS ASSIGNED CLOSED
7 / 7 5 8 0  / 0 7   / 0 0

    

Weekly Up to Date Performance

April 7 – 11, 2014

New purchases beat the time adjusted S&P 500 this week by 2.1% and the unadjusted S&P 500 index by 2.3% during a week that saw the highs and the lows of trading behavior.

The beat of the index was the largest that I can recall, but as always that kind of thing , especially to that magnitude, will only occur during significant market weakness.

The market showed a large adjusted loss for the week of 2.5% and an even larger 2.7% unadjusted loss for the week, while new positions lost 0.4%.

It’s like standing next to a much uglier group of people. You always do well in the comparisons.  

Existing positions out-performed the market by 0.4% for the week after unusually large beats in each of the two previous weeks, which was predominantly due to the ability to keep rolling over and selling new cover for uncovered positions. 

Since this week was an unusual one in which no positions were assigned, thank you Thursday and Friday, for positions closed in 2014 the performance is the same as last week.  

Performance exceeded that of the S&P 500 by 1.6%. They were up 3.6% out-performing the market by 90.9%.

What a week.

While there’s never a shortage of reasons to explain what is going on it’s amazing how one day’s truth becomes the next day’s fallacy.

This week in less than 24 hours, in fact, in about just 20 hours we went from the joy of believing that low interest rates were to be upon us for the foreseeable future to fretting about rising interest rates.

Or at least that’s the best interpretation that anyone could put on the 450 point turnaround from Wednesday to Thursday’s closing bell and that continued to be the story that most people were sticking with as another 140 points were dropped to end the week.

This was a good week to learn the old adage of not counting your chickens until they’re hatched, but it was also another good week to be hedged and to wonder if anyone really knows what’s going on around them.

Barely 48 hours ago it looked as if there would be loads of assignme
nts and what wouldn’t be assigned would simply be rolled over.

How did that work out?

While I felt fortunate last week to have gotten all of those assignments and rollovers, as the market finished the week on a very strained note, this week evened things out, at least as far as assignments go. Fortunately, there was some opportunity to get a limited number of rollovers completed.

What that likely means for next week is that even with what appear to be more bargains than we’ve seen in a while, I won’t be aggressively seeking them out. I’m going to be much more interested in finding any opportunity to sell calls on existing uncovrered positions, especially since this week added a number to that list after a few weeks of reducing their numbers and put those stocks to work.

While I would have liked to have rolled over more positions as the market disappointed my hopes for a bounce higher today, sometimes there is a limit to what you believe is an acceptable reward.

Today it was difficult to find those rewards and I found myself preferring to wait until the next to see whether things get any better.

What had me a little optimistic enough to defer some rollovers was that the mid-afternoon concerns that there might be a “geo-political” event over the weekend did not drive stocks lower and news that there was a large sell order imbalance at the close also didn’t drive shares lower, either.

Those both could have easily sent the markets into a sustained sell-off, but that never happened. That has to give some reason to think that there may be a better day ahead.

The technicians on the other hand will point to the NASDAQ closing a hair below the 4000 level, which they view as portending more selling.

Still, when the market goes down is when you often most readily see the benefits of being wary, as both new positions and existing positions significantly out-performed the market, despite the fact that shares were also further lowered due to the fairly large number of ex-dividend positions this week.

At least that money will come back to the account.

Hopefully next week will see more come back into the account on paper, as shares bounce back, but more importantly some real cash hits the accounts as contracts are sold.

With markets now down about 4.5% from their highs we’re simply back to having the same discussion as about a month ago. Since then we just fell back into the same patter and exceeded the old highs.

At some point even well worn patterns find their exceptions, but there’s certainly nothing fundamentally deteriorating around us that should give cause and reason for the market to suddenly change its fundamental behavior, especially since by the mist basic of measures it isn’t expensive. 

While I started this week looking
forward to having a week much like the previous one, i can’t say the same for next week. While I look forward to it, I do so in the hope that the relative out-performance continues, but at least is accompanied by some absolute gains, as well.

It’s easy to get used to those and I don’t know about you, but I need my fix.

 

  

     

This week’s details may be seen in the Weekly Performance spreadsheet * or in the PDF file, as well as as in the summary.below

(Note: Duplicate mention of positions reflects different priced lots):



New Positions Opened:  CHK, CMCSA, COH, CY, LOW, MET, SBUX

Puts Closed in order to take profits:  none

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the next weekly cycle:  AIG, BMY, COH, SBUX

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into extended weekly cycle:  C (4/25), GM (5/2), GPS (4/25), VZ (4/25)

Calls Rolled over, taking profits, into the monthly cycle:  none

Calls Rolled Over, taking profits, into a future monthly cycle: none

Calls Rolled Up, taking net profits into same cyclenone

New STO:  EBAY, FDO, LULU, MA, PM

Put contracts sold and still open: none

Put contracts expired: none

Put contract rolled over: none< /span>

Long term call contracts sold:  none

Calls Assigned:  

Calls Expired:   BMY, CMCSA, HFC, LOW, MET, MOS, TGT

Puts Assigned:  none

Stock positions Closed to take profits:  none

Stock positions Closed to take losses: none

Calls Closed to Take Profits: none

Ex-dividend Positions:  CHK (4/10 $0.09), GPS (4/7 $0.22), MA (4/7 $0.11), VZ (4/8 $0.53), DRI (4/8 $0.55), FCX (4/11 $0.31), WFM (4/9 $0.12)

Ex-dividend Positions Next Week:  none

 

 

For the coming week the existing positions have lots that still require the sale of contracts:   AGQ, BMY, C, CLF, CMCSA, FCX, GM,  HFC, IP, JCP, LOW, MCP,  MET, MOS,  NEM, PBR, RIG, TGT, WFM, WLT, WY (See “Weekly Performance” spreadsheet or PDF file)



* If you don’t have a program to read or modify spreadsheets, you can download the OpenOffice Suite at no cost.